Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
Latest comments made on this video:
By: bq041. on 24 Aug 08, 14:57:38
It is not possible. But, hey I'm open minded. You build me one and show me how you can distort the laws of physics. Better yet, I'll settle just for the equations of how you can break water and then recombine it, yielding more energy than you started with.
By: renderrob. on 24 Aug 08, 11:03:04
He's using a different type of electrolysis, it yields more energy than it consumes.
By: surfotw10. on 18 Aug 08, 19:12:07
Whatever I said before has nothing to do with traffic signals. In fact, I'm against traffic signals, they waste time creating traffic jams and polluting more the environment. I know the laws of physics but you can't deny that quantum mechanics also explains things that do occur such as rogue waves which cannot be explained by the common laws of physics. I'm simply suggesting that there should be a way that water can be separated and burned. Of course there's lots of fraud out there.
By: halocekicksass. on 18 Aug 08, 03:23:35
What if you made a zero emission generator and extracted the hydrogen with electrolysis?
By: bq041. on 16 Aug 08, 03:36:12
That is exactly what it is, silly. It take WAY more energy to break water into hydrogen and oxygen than you would ever get back by combusting the two. He talks about the "clean, renewable source of energy..." What about all the coal that is being burned to create the massive amount of electricity it consumes. I used to run an electrolytic O2 plant and it takes HUGE amounts of electricity.
By: samarthdevendra001. on 15 Aug 08, 17:19:13
pseudo scientest
By: hajajseksi. on 11 Aug 08, 21:47:27
that sounded like they had big power transformer in there i dont seam to me that this big transformer is to big for the lill flame that it gives... dunno much about geting H and O but i know how does sound big transformer =D
By: FredricF. on 09 Aug 08, 22:26:12
This is so silly. Electrolysis of water is not a new idea and it has been discussed and used for decades. And it is not a way to generate energy. It is a way to use electrical energy energy to split H2O into two parts H2 and one part O2 and then later burn H2 and O2 to, for example, run a car. Not new, only the O2 is abundant in the air so there is no reason to store it in a tank.
By: brygenon. on 06 Aug 08, 02:31:02
The energy released by a hydrogen bomb is equal to the difference in the nuclear binding energy of the fuel and the end products.
By: surrealdirector. on 30 Jul 08, 16:55:29
Do you work for an oil company? Explain how the conservation of energy works with a hydrogen bomb. Good luck!
By: ScotchMoose. on 30 Jul 08, 14:00:36
So the poorly timed traffic signals that waste gas are your fault. I guess they don't teach basic physics the class where they teach you how to foul up traffic. Electrolysis uses more energy then you get back burning the hydrogen. Water power is a scam. Anyone that knows the most basic concepts of physics and chemistry knows the conservation of energy is a law of nature.
By: surfotw10. on 25 Jul 08, 21:47:52
I'm a civil engineer and I do believe the technology of water as a fuel is possible. Hydrogen is the most abundant source of energy in the entire universe. And using it as a fuel gives water again. What I find interesting is that most videos relating to this topic have an extremely poor resolution.
By: isaaccade. on 21 Jul 08, 16:09:59
You wish to know the real controllers of the world? OIL COMPANIES!!..!!!
By: dodoshlodo. on 19 Jul 08, 07:13:36
yeh true that, its all about setting up a resonant frequency between the plates and that seems to do all the work to split it, not the current
By: dodoshlodo. on 19 Jul 08, 07:12:04
yeh well tell that to the energy giants of the world
By: geoff390. on 19 Jul 08, 05:37:04
That defies some of the laws of physics. Energy cannot be made only rearranged.
By: Donninator1. on 19 Jul 08, 02:00:22
almost 30 years ago.. yet people don't know this exist!!! DAMN THE CONTROLLERS OF THE WOLRD
By: SFIndian83. on 16 Jul 08, 09:29:14
idiots like this are the reason why i have to take thermodynamics
By: dodoshlodo. on 15 Jul 08, 14:22:36
read into it u dick, theres heaps of ppl making fuel out of water
By: dodoshlodo. on 15 Jul 08, 14:20:58
no its not! its called free energy because u get more energy out than in
By: Crypto7Jocko0. on 13 Jul 08, 03:15:47
Water powered jet engines would clean away the air pollution.
By: noeyed210. on 10 Jul 08, 19:05:26
It's called Free Energy because water is free.
By: Karaokephile. on 09 Jul 08, 16:30:20
Nowhere does this guy claim free energy. He's only talking about clean burning. Stop reading more into it than what he's saying. Sure gasoline is expensive, but try to keep within the bounds of reality for a solution.
By: crazyeirishman. on 09 Jul 08, 08:07:03
Dude, that's offensive. Idiots who buy into this scam do not represent all Americans. I'm sure the other members of any social groups to which you belong are glad that I am not judging all of them as JERKS based on my observation of YOU.
By: crazyeirishman. on 09 Jul 08, 08:02:50
There are only 3 stable isotopes of hydrogen. Hydrogen, Deuterium, and Tritium.